Sunday, January 25, 2009

'A Poem is the Case of the Deliberate Transformed by the Accidental...'


(Roof Top, Background, Similar (Village, Santa Lucìa, Oct. 07))

...is a quote from poet David Kirby's article Why, Poetry? which can be found here.

David Kirby is an American Poet and Professor of English at Florida State University.

The article includes his ideas on pretty much every aspect of poetry. The first one being what a poem is and what the poet’s relationship is to the poem, he says the following:

A poem is a reluctant lover. You, the poet, are crazy about it, but it couldn’t care less about you. Pursue the poem aggressively and it’ll run away or, like a figure out of Greek myth, fall dead at your feet when you touch it. Reverse psychology will only get you so far: If you ignore a poem, it might whisper a line in your ear the way the answer to a crossword clue pops into your head when you’re not looking at the puzzle, but it won’t whisper two lines, much less a whole stanza.

Great summing up, don’t you think? The two-way choice – fuss the poem into oblivion or give it the cold shoulder and strike lucky only on the barest of an offchance.
He later goes on to say that:

A poem is the case of the deliberate transformed by the accidental.

The deliberate is the intention of writing a poem and the accidental is the unexpected that happens to jolt life into the poem. He says that in the film Casablanca, the deliberate happens when a woman walks into a bar, the accidental is what follows, the play-it-again-Sam lift that makes what starts out as trivial transform into art. In Ode to a Grecian Urn – the deliberate is the guy noticing some pottery; the accidental is what happens because of him noticing the pottery.

He also speaks of the reaction people give when he says he is a poet:

When strangers ask what I do and I tell them I’m a poet, a typical reaction is, “Gee, I just don’t get poetry.” But do you “get” Rossini’s String Quartet in C Major, I reply? Or if you’re at a dance recital, do you stand up in the middle of row H and shout, “Stop! I don’t get it!” Just give poetry a chance, I say. Many poems don’t work for me either, but most are short, so I just keep reading until I find one that, as Emily Dickinson put it, takes the top off your head when you read it, or gives you a chill no fire can warm.

I love the parallels he makes here between ‘not getting’ poetry and the idea of someone stopping in mid-listen or mid-look to cry similar regarding ‘not getting’ a piece of classical music or a dance recital. The idea of giving poetry a chance and not having the need to ‘make things click’ immediately is one of the fundamentals of enjoying poetry. One can allow music and art to wash over them and bring them ‘there’ but it seems that poetry is deemed to have the ‘I don’t get it’ cry attached to it for life.

He goes on further to talk about how poetry is a unique art form. He compares poetry with fiction by saying:

If art parallels life—if it recreates on another level the mixture of light and shadow that is human existence—then what makes poetry unique as an art form? Let’s compare poetry to its closest relative, fiction. This is a simplification, but in fiction, the writer is usually trying to get George to Sarah’s house by eight o’clock with a bunch of roses, say, whereas in a poem, there’s usually neither a George nor a Sarah but an “I” who is trying to understand something that will probably never be fully understood.

The rest of the article is very interesting as well. He goes on to talk about reviewing poetry and the whole American history of the practice of poetry since World War II.

One line I found totally enchanting and revealing is the below. He uses this line to explain what writing about poetry is like ...and it seems to sum it all up. : )

So writing about poetry is like taking a photo of Bigfoot: There’s a grainy image, but the main thing you notice are the tracks leading into the trees.

* As an aside, there is a David Kirby connection to one of my poems and The Wrong Miracle, albeit a tiny, tiny connection, but this is how I discovered this guy. : ) I talk about it over there...

14 Comments:

Blogger Rachel Fox said...

As usual Emily Dickinson hits the nail on the head (or slices the top off it). I tend to think of it as an arrow (or even a bullet) through the heart (when you read something in a poem that is just SO right and observant and perfect...it feels like someone's shot you...I think). And of course the best thing with poetry is that the shot is purely metaphorical...or it should be...
x

10:13 a.m.  
Blogger Unknown said...

Tell the truth but tell it slant, is my favourite Emily quote. I'm off to read more of David Kirby's article, thanks Liz :)

3:41 p.m.  
Blogger Liz said...

Hi Rachel, like the bullet through the heart metaphor! : )

Barbara, yes, the truth but slanted...speaks volume : )

x

9:37 a.m.  
Blogger Totalfeckineejit said...

The poems I like best are often the ones I understand least.i sometimes wonder if the poet always fully understands them either.(I'm not often sure wot da feck me own are about)Liking them is enough for me. understanding should not be a prerequisite for enjoying a poem , if it were no-one would like Dylan Thomas who often used words not for their meaning but their sound.I love yer mans notion of a poem being a living breathing entity with a life and mind of it's own.Interesting too, the crossword analogy, as I have often thought writing a poem is a bit like solving an abstract crossword

4:22 p.m.  
Blogger Liz said...

Hi TFE, thanks for your thoughts there. Too true about mostly not knowing the meaning behind what one is writing...sometimes it's someone else who points it out and then there is the penny-dropping moment...I think that's what I like about poetry - the surprise element that's there for the writer too!

10:16 a.m.  
Blogger Bebe Cook said...

Hi Liz,

I much enjoyed the article, this is a question I have been asking myself a lot lately, the Why? of poetry, I love the comparison to art and dance, and the truth that we don't have to "get" every poem.
I am going to go read the rest of the article, very big hugs to you.

xo

:) brenda

12:09 p.m.  
Blogger Group 8 said...

I like poems that have mystery and a shot of surprise. Not easy to write but great to read.

4:08 p.m.  
Blogger Liz said...

Hi Brenda, it is true isn't it about not having to know the whole 'ins and outs' of a poem to enjoy it - the sounds, images etc...a good poem always has so much going for it.

Hi Nuala, oh yes - the magic combo - mystery and surprise - I think that must be where the accidental comes into it - there is no quick-fix to getting 'surprise' in there. : )

xx

8:54 a.m.  
Blogger Totalfeckineejit said...

Psst Liz , It's me ,sorry goin off topic like but I've been lokin at some of yer old doggy posts and I have to say the resemblance between our pooch and yours is uncanny-They have the very same head!! How can that be? How can two dogs have one head??Right, Ssshh! I'm off now before somebody notices I'm not talking about Embley Dickerson.

5:56 p.m.  
Blogger Liz said...

Two right head-the-balls, if you ask me...TFE ; ) Aren't they the spit of each other, though? And pure holy terrors into the bargain...Dicko has escaped from his cushy number in the garden and is gallivanting about the valley just now. There is no keeping him in....he's a half-Jack-russell and they say that these dogs have a Napoleon-complex as in 'all I see is mine, all I want, I will have'...but he/they can be the best of crack so we have to forgive him/them! ; )

6:37 p.m.  
Blogger Dominic Rivron said...

DK's musings about "getting" Rossini got me wondering. Do practitioners of an art form always think it's "their" art form that the public doesn't get?
It may be that people, when they know you're a poet/painter/composer/etc., tend to confide that they don't "get" the art you practise. Perhaps they hope for enlightenment "from the horse's mouth".
In reality, it's probably true that people often feel they ought to "get" the arts in a way they don't. I think this is sometimes to do with people expecting something "intellectual" when they are really being offered something visceral, and sometimes to do with the fact that a good work of art does, on one level, mystify.

2:18 p.m.  
Blogger Liz said...

Dominic, thanks for stopping by. You`ve made some interesting points- what you say could be true regarding 'the horse's mouth' I like it. And yes the 'intellectual' and 'visceral'...thanks - enjoyed reading your comments.

9:05 a.m.  
Blogger Michelle said...

What a wonderful post, Liz! Thank you.

7:09 a.m.  
Blogger Liz said...

Thanks for reading, Michelle and lovely to meet you. : )

1:33 p.m.  

Post a Comment

<< Home

All Photos/Images/Text on this site are copyrighted.